Quality of farm malt: the impact of production methods

Vratislav Psota; Jørund Geving; Milan Starec; Markéta Garčárová; Petr Holub; Jaromír Fiala; Sigurd Johan Saure

doi:10.18832/kp2025.71.980

Authors

Vratislav Psota Research Institute of Brewing and Malting, Mostecká 971/7, 614 00 Brno, Czech Republic
Jørund Geving Kongshaugvegen 21, 7513 Stjørdal, Norway
Milan Starec National Museum of Brewing, Českobrodská 17, 281 63 Kostelec nad Černými lesy, Czech Republic
Markéta Garčárová Research Institute of Brewing and Malting, Mostecká 971/7, 614 00 Brno, Czech Republic
Petr Holub National Museum of Brewing, Českobrodská 17, 281 63 Kostelec nad Černými lesy, Czech Republic
Jaromír Fiala National Museum of Brewing, Českobrodská 17, 281 63 Kostelec nad Černými lesy, Czech Republic
Sigurd Johan Saure Aurdalsvegen 95, 6230 Sykkylven, Norway

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18832/kp2025.71.980

Keywords:

floor malting, såinn-type kiln, farmhous malt, malt quality

Abstract

This case study examines the impact of production methods and barley varieties on the quality of farm malts. The experiment used samples of three spring barley varieties: the two-row varieties Domen and Thermus, and the six-row variety Bredo. Four samples of farm malts were produced from these varieties using different production methods, which are described in tabular form. The differences in quality between the samples were significant. The sample labelled Thermus JG produced malt that approached current quality standards. The other three samples showed low levels of modification. The extract content in the malt dry matter ranged from 72.7% to 79.5%, the Kolbach index ranged from 32.6% to 33.7%, and the ß-glucan content ranged from 1010 to 1290 mg/l. The farm malt samples produced cloudy wort, and the mash aroma was described as burnt, smoky, and smokey. The laboratory malt produced in the micro-malting plant also had significantly low quality. The results indicate that the choice of variety and production method has a crucial impact on the quality of the final malt.

References

Aufhammer G., Bergal P., Hagberg A., Horne F.R., van Veldhuizen H. (1968). Barley varieties – EBC, Third revised and enlarged edition. Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

Baxter E.D., O’Farrell D.D. (1983). Use of the friabilimeter to assess homogeneity of malt. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 89(3), 210–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2050-0416.1983.tb04169.x

EBC Analysis Commitee (2010). Analytica-EBC. Fachverlag Hans Carl, Nuremberg, 794 p. ISBN: 978-3-418-00759-5

Garshol L.M. (2020). Historical brewing techniques: The lost art of farmhouse brewing. B,rewers Publications, Boulder, USA. ISBN 10: 1-938469-55-0

Graminor [online]. Bredo, Graminor [Accessed January 31, 2025]. https://graminor.no/sort/bredo/

Graminor [online]. Thermus, Graminor. [Accessed January 31, 2025]. https://graminor.no/sort/thermus/

Kunze, W. (2010). Technology Brewing and Malting, 4th Edition. VLB Berlin, Germany. ISBN: 978-3-921690-64-2

MEBAK (2011). Raw Materials: barley, adjuncts, malt, hops and hop products. Collection of brewing analysis methods of the Mitteleuropäische Brautechnische Analysenkommission (MEBAK), Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.

MEBAK (2018). Raw materials: barley, adjuncts, malt, hops and hop products. Collection of brewing analysis methods of the Mitteleuropäische Brautechnische Analysenkommission (MEBAK), Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany. ISBN 978-3-9815960-3-8

Ping H., Wang J.H., Ren G.X. (2013). Prediction of the total starch and amylose content in barley using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 19(3), 231–237.

Psota V., Kosař K. (2002). Malting quality index. Kvasny Prumysl, 48(6), 142–148. https://doi.org/10.18832/kp2002011